Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Bytecore News
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Bytecore News
    Home»Uncategorized»FTX Victims Sue Law Firm Fenwick & West For $525M Over Alleged Role In Collapse
    Uncategorized

    FTX Victims Sue Law Firm Fenwick & West For $525M Over Alleged Role In Collapse

    May 14, 20263 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    kraken


    A group of 20 victims from five countries or jurisdictions has filed a $525 million lawsuit against Fenwick & West LLP, one of Silicon Valley’s top tech law firms, accusing it of helping conceal the FTX fraud.

    The complaint, filed Wednesday in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, names the firm alongside six individual defendants. The plaintiffs say they lost their life savings when FTX collapsed, claiming that Fenwick’s involvement gave the exchange a false air of legitimacy that kept them from pulling their money out.

    At the center of the case is testimony from Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, who pleaded guilty to fraud charges and testified at Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial. Singh said he personally told Fenwick attorneys that customer funds were being misused, and instead of walking away, the firm advised on how to hide it.

    The complaint goes further. It says Fenwick attorneys set up North Dimension Inc., a Delaware shell company that posed as an electronics retailer but funneled over $3 billion in stolen customer funds. The firm also allegedly implemented FTX’s Signal auto-delete messaging policy, the same system federal prosecutors said helped the fraud go undetected by regulators and investigators.

    binance

    Related: FTX estate misses out on $3B Cursor stake value after $200K sale in 2023

    Examiner found Fenwick “intertwined” in FTX’s wrongdoing

    A court-appointed bankruptcy examiner, whose report came out in 2024 after reviewing more than 200,000 documents, found that Fenwick created the corporate structures for both FTX and Alameda Research, formed shell entities to obscure money movements, and drafted backdated agreements to cover illicit transfers, the complaint states. The examiner concluded the firm was “deeply intertwined in nearly every aspect of FTX Group’s wrongdoing,” the lawsuit reads.

    “These findings are those of a court-appointed officer based on documentary evidence in federal bankruptcy proceedings to which Fenwick was a party,” the lawsuit added.

    FTX victims file lawsuit against Fenwick. Source: CourtListener

    After FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, Fenwick scrubbed all mentions of the exchange from its website. The firm also quietly hired top-tier law firm defense lawyers at Gibson Dunn before any civil lawsuit was filed against it, per the lawsuit.

    The plaintiffs are bringing seven claims against Fenwick, including malpractice, fraud and gross negligence. They are seeking compensatory damages exceeding $525 million, return of all legal fees Fenwick earned from FTX and punitive damages against partners Tyler Newby and Daniel Friedberg for “deliberate and reckless individual professional conduct.”

    Related: Sam Bankman-Fried withdraws motion for a new trial, still asks for new judge

    Judge denies SBF’s bid for new trial

    Last month, a federal judge denied Bankman-Fried’s bid for a new trial, calling his claims of new evidence baseless. Judge Lewis Kaplan, who sentenced the former FTX CEO to 25 years in prison in 2024, said Bankman-Fried’s argument that three former FTX executives could counter the government’s case was without merit, noting that he knew all three witnesses well before the trial.

    Bankman-Fried had argued that Ryan Salame and Daniel Chapsky could challenge the government’s claims about FTX’s insolvency, and that Nishad Singh changed his testimony under pressure from prosecutors. Kaplan dismissed those claims as “wildly conspiratorial and entirely contradicted by the record.”

    Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026



    Source link

    livechat
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    CryptoExpert
    • Website

    Related Posts

    What This Solana’s 108% Growth Means For The Price

    May 17, 2026

    Bitcoin Monthly Structure Signals Continuation Of Major Historical Trend

    May 17, 2026

    Michael Saylor Floated Bitcoin Sales Idea to Avoid ‘Impairing The Asset’

    May 17, 2026

    Top community-driven tokens and the best crypto presales to watch

    May 17, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    murf
    Latest Posts

    Ethereum Triangle Breakdown Adds Pressure On Its Recovery Outlook

    May 17, 2026

    Thorchain Exploit Triggers Security Fears Across DeFi

    May 17, 2026

    US CLARITY Act Will Be a ‘Boon For Domestic Innovation’: A16z

    May 17, 2026

    Canary XRP ETF Reports 213 Million XRP Holdings Worth $305 Million

    May 17, 2026

    Is LINK undervalued or is Meme Punch the better entry point?

    May 17, 2026
    frase
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights

    What This Solana’s 108% Growth Means For The Price

    May 17, 2026

    Bitcoin Monthly Structure Signals Continuation Of Major Historical Trend

    May 17, 2026
    bybit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 BytecoreNews.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.